As immigration authorities advance what supporters describe as the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history, several states are enacting measures to shield children from foster care when detained parents have no nearby family or friends to assume temporary custody.
The aim is to keep families together where feasible while maintaining safety and accountability in the child welfare system. This issue sits at the intersection of national policy and local child welfare practice, and it demands careful, prudent action.
The federal government does not track how many children enter foster care because of immigration enforcement actions, leaving the scope of the issue unclear. In Oregon, as of February, two children had been placed in foster care after separation in detention cases.
“Before fall 2025, this simply had never happened before,” Sunderland said. This revelation points to a developing pattern that could shift the burden in state systems and tests the capacity of communities to respond.
Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement
As of mid-February, nearly 70,000 people were being held by immigration authorities, with a record 73,000 in January representing an 84 percent increase from a year earlier. The surge underscores the scale at which families are affected, and it intensifies the urgency of policy responses that can preserve parental bonds without compromising safety and due process.
ProPublica reported that parents of 11,000 children who are U.S. citizens were detained from the beginning of Trump’s term through August. The figure illustrates the broad reach of enforcement actions and the potential for long-term effects on child welfare and family stability. It also raises questions about how best to balance national security aims with the well-being of vulnerable children.
NOTUS reported in February that at least 32 children of detained or deported parents had been placed in foster care in seven states. This snapshot shows that the trend is not isolated to a single jurisdiction and suggests that many communities will need policies that anticipate these separations and offer clear guardianship pathways.
Sandy Santana, executive director of Children’s Rights, says the official numbers may undercount.
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
“That, to us, seems really, really low,” he said. His concern reflects the discomfort many advocates feel about the hidden toll of separation on children and families who may be displaced without adequate support or transparency about the true scope of the issue.
Separation from a parent is deeply traumatic for children and can lead to various health and psychological issues, including post-traumatic stress disorder. Prolonged, intense stress can lead to more frequent infections and developmental issues.
That “toxic stress” is also associated with damage to areas of the brain responsible for learning and memory. The health implications are not abstract, but real, measurable risks that can shape a child’s life trajectory for years.
Maryland, New York, Washington, D.C., and Virginia amended existing laws during the previous administration to allow guardians to be granted temporary parental rights for immigration enforcement reasons. Now the enforcement surge that began after the new term has prompted a fresh wave of state responses intended to protect children from destabilizing custody shifts while their parents are detained.
In New Jersey, lawmakers are considering a bill to amend a state law that allows parents to nominate standby, or temporary, guardians in cases of death, incapacity, or debilitation. The bill would add separation due to federal immigration enforcement as another allowable reason. The move would provide a formal mechanism for guardians to assume responsibility quickly, reducing the risk of protracted foster care placement.
Nevada and California passed laws last year to protect families separated by immigration enforcement actions. California’s Family Preparedness Plan Act allows parents to nominate guardians and share custodial rights, instead of having them suspended, while they’re detained. Parents regain their full parental rights if they are released and able to reunite with their children.
There are significant legal barriers to reunification once a child is placed in state custody, said Juan Guzman, director of children’s court and guardianship at the Alliance for Children’s Rights.
If a parent’s child is placed in foster care and the parent cannot participate in required court proceedings because they are in detention or have been deported, it’s less likely they will be able to reunite with their child, Guzman said. These realities underscore the need for proactive planning by families and communities.
An estimated 5.6 million children are U.S. citizens who live with a parent or family member who does not have legal immigration status, according to Brookings Institution research. Within that group, 2.6 million children have two parents lacking legal status.
Santanasiders note that the scale suggests a growing set of cases that will test state capacity and family resilience as enforcement efforts continue.
ICE directives require the agency to make efforts to facilitate detained parents’ participation in family court, child welfare, or guardianship proceedings, but Santana said it’s uncertain whether ICE is complying with those rules. The debate over implementation and oversight will shape how these families navigate the coming months.
Folks don’t want to talk about it, right? Guzman said. The parent having to speak to a child about the possibility of separation, it’s scary. It’s not something anybody wants to do. The emotional burden on families is heavy, but the financial and legal costs of disorganization may be even heavier for communities that must absorb the fallout of unplanned custody changes.
The broader health and welfare implications are not confined to the immediate separation. When parents are detained, the ability to participate in court proceedings and to manage guardianship matters becomes a public health issue as well.
Ensuring continuity of care, safeguarding medical information, and maintaining access to essential services require careful policy design, clear lines of authority, and robust community support networks.
The wake of these policies also raises questions about how best to protect the rights of parents and children without undermining the overall goals of immigration enforcement. The structures put in place in various states reflect a pragmatic recognition that families belong together when feasible and that children’s health and development can be compromised by abrupt, destabilizing separations.
The challenge now is to translate intent into practice in a manner that is predictable, humane, and fair for all involved.
Are you feeling overwhelmed or hopeless right now? Have you been withdrawing from people or activities you usually enjoy? Are you having thoughts about hurting yourself, or feeling like things will never improve?
You do not have to handle those feelings alone. Support is available, and talking to someone can make a difference. You can reach out to the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988, or by chatting online at 988lifeline.org. Trained counselors are available 24 hours a day to listen and help.
If you believe someone is in immediate danger, call emergency services right away. Even a small step, like reaching out to a trusted friend, family member, or professional, can help create a path forward.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.