A heated exchange in Congress put the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program at the center of debate as Rep. Brandon Gill pressed a SNAP advocate to explain why taxpayer funds should cover sugary drinks like Coca-Cola.

During a House Oversight subcommittee hearing Thursday, Gill repeatedly asked whether Americans "need Coca-Cola to survive" as lawmakers reviewed issues of waste, fraud, and abuse in the $100 billion nutrition program serving more than 40 million Americans.

The tense moment unfolded during questioning of Gina Plata-Nino, director of policy and advocacy for the Food Research and Action Center, who argued that SNAP is intended to help families buy "food and beverages" without dictating specific choices.

When Gill narrowed his focus to sugary sodas, Plata-Nino said she preferred to discuss hunger and nutrition rather than restrict what Americans can purchase.

Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement

Unconvinced, Gill pressed further, asking whether "tax dollars should be used to pay for sodas" and again challenging whether such drinks are essential for survival.

Plata-Nino responded that some individuals with "low blood issues" or "kidney issues" may rely on sugary drinks, noting that nutritional needs vary across households.

Gill then asked, "Do the American people need Coca-Cola to survive?... What's nutritional about Coca-Cola?" prompting Plata-Nino to clarify, "I am not a nutritionist. I am a food security expert."

The congressman argued that "there's not nutritional value to sugary sodas" and criticized her reluctance to say taxpayer money should not be used for them.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

Plata-Nino attempted to pivot, stating, "I think that focusing on soda when people are going hungry," before Gill interrupted again, emphasizing concerns about program spending.

"We spend a lot of our tax dollars... on soda. That's why I'm asking about it," Gill replied, expressing frustration over what he viewed as waste within SNAP.

When asked whether drinking soda daily is healthy, Plata-Nino countered that "the worst health outcome is hunger," reinforcing her focus on ensuring struggling families can access basic food.

The broader hearing highlighted divisions between Republicans and Democrats on how to manage the massive program. Republicans pushed for stricter oversight to curb potential misuse, while Democrats cautioned against new limits that could make food access harder for low-income households.

Charts presented at the hearing illustrated SNAP’s reach as a critical safety net for millions of Americans, revealing how deeply the program influences daily nutrition and household budgets.

As the session closed, Gill’s exchange with Plata-Nino underscored an ongoing national argument over personal responsibility, nutrition policy, and how taxpayer funds should be spent within federal food assistance programs.

WATCH BELOW: